HMRC CHALLENGING NATIONAL MINIMUM WAGE BREACHES REGARDING UNIFORMS.

blog header image

Posted : 12 Dec 2019 at 11:03:26
Category: News

Share this article

If your business pays National Minimum Wage (NMW) or just above the threshold and places a requirement on staff regarding uniform, you could be open to a breach of your NMW obligations. With HMRC challenges increasing, Mark Taylor shares how you can ensure you're fully compliant.

The NMW is not a tax and the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) is responsible for NMW compliance and enforcement policy. However, HMRC is charged with enforcing the legislation on BEIS’s behalf.

HMRC is targeting the hospitality industry for potential NMW breaches in situations where employers require employees to wear a specific uniform as a condition of their employment. If you the employer requires your staff the worker to purchase specific items, such as overalls, then any deductions made from employee pay or payments made to you (the employer) in respect of those items will always reduce national minimum wage pay. If a worker makes a payment to a third party for required uniforms, the payment will also reduce national minimum wage pay since it is expenditure incurred in connection with the worker’s employment.

Most businesses have a dress code on what people must wear to work. This should not be a problem for employers paying significantly above the NMW because the cost of clothing should not reduce wages below it. However, employers who pay workers at or slightly above the NMW need to take care that their dress code could not cause technical breaches of the rules. This is a particular problem for the retail and hospitality sectors.

Where a uniform is not required or where a worker freely chooses to pay for additional items of uniform (over and above the dress requirements of the employment), any payment to the employer or a third party will not reduce national minimum wage pay. The worker can also arrange to purchase optional items from a third party and ask their employer to deduct the cost from their pay and pay the third party on their behalf. The deduction will not reduce the worker’s national minimum wage pay.

Example one: An employer requires its workers to wear a t-shirt with the restaurant’s logo which is purchased from the employer. The purchase (either by payment to the employer or deduction from the worker’s pay) will reduce national minimum wage pay.

Example two: If the worker in example 1 freely chooses to purchase an additional branded t-shirt from the employer, this is not then a requirement of the job. So, a payment for the item would not reduce national minimum wage pay, however, a deduction from the worker’s pay would still reduce their national minimum wage pay.

Example three: A restaurant requires workers to wear a uniform consisting of any black trousers and any white t-shirt. Workers can purchase these from any shop. The cost of purchasing these items will reduce national minimum wage pay since it is a specific requirement imposed on the worker by the employer.

If an employer provides a uniform, any charge the employer makes for ordinary wear and tear to that uniform will reduce the worker’s national minimum wage pay. However, if the worker damages the uniform, loses it or does not return it at the end of the employment, the charge will not reduce national minimum wage pay, provided:

  • the damage, loss or non-return is a result of the worker’s misconduct and
  • the charge is the result of a contractual requirement.

Example four: A worker is required to wear an employer supplied uniform. His contract states he must return the uniform if he leaves the employment and if he does not, the cost will be deducted from his final pay. If the worker fails to return the uniform as required, the deduction will not reduce national minimum wage pay since it is contractual deduction relating to conduct.

HMRC is also specifically targeting footwear where they believe the employer requires an employee to wear specific or uniform shoes. The retailer, Iceland Foods, has been accused of breaching NMW rules in relation to guidance it issued to store employees to wear ‘sensible shoes’. The company provides safety shoes free of charge for those who request them, normally warehouse workers rather than store staff. The latter can, and usually do provide their own footwear. HMRC’s contention is that the pay for store staff who chose to buy their own footwear would have fallen below the NMW in the weeks that the shoes were bought and has said Iceland should refund store staff for two shoe purchases a year, at a notional value of £20 each, going back six years.

NMW investigations should not be under-estimated. The number of investigations opened by HMRC into employers over potential breaches of the NMW increased 43% to 3,975 for the year ending 31 March 2018, up from 2,775 in 2016-17. HMRC identified £15.6m in pay owed to more than 200,000 workers in 2017-18 and imposed fines of £14m. More than 600 employers were ‘named and shamed’ in that period by the BEIS. Non-compliance with NMW, even as a result of a technical breach, can be costly in financial terms but also in adverse media attention.

Original Source - Buzzacott

https://www.buzzacott.co.uk/insights/hmrc-challenging-national-minimum-wage-breaches-regarding-uniforms

LATEST SIMILAR NEWS

LAING O’ROURKE TO BUILD EVERTON’S NEW STADIUM
Posted on: 20 Feb 2020 at 10:07:10
Everton Football Club has appointed Laing O’Rourke as preferred contractor for its planned 52,000 capacity stadium at Bramley-Moore Dock on Liverpool’s waterfront.Dan Meis’ brick, steel and glass design takes its inspiration from the historic maritime and warehouse buildings nearbyA pre-construction...
POUND RALLIES AS UK EMPLOYMENT HITS RECORD HIGH AND WAGES BEAT 2008 PEAK
Posted on: 18 Feb 2020 at 13:45:59
Wages beat their pre-financial crisis peak for the first time at the end of 2019, as the level of UK employment rose to a record high of 32.9m people.A total of 180,000 people entered the workforce between October and December 2019, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said today.Read more:&nbsp...
THE DEATH OF ENTREPRENEURS RELIEF? IF SO, HOW DO WE SECURE IT?
Posted on: 10 Feb 2020 at 10:34:44
There is a lot of talk about ER being scrappedOur view is that ER will be retained but restricted furtherAre your clients concerned about a loss of ER? If so, a solution exists.Introduction“Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated”The story goes that this was the text of a cable sent by Mark Twai...
NATIONAL SICKIE DAY: HOW MANY OF YOUR STAFF ARE IN?
Posted on: 03 Feb 2020 at 11:52:16
Today (03/02/20) is National Sickie Day, the first Monday of February when your staff is most likely to call in sick.Numerous reasons have been given to this day being a hotbed for employees pulling a sickie, such as it being the first payday following Christmas and so employees have been out at the...
BREXIT DAY DEBRIEF
Posted on: 31 Jan 2020 at 16:17:36
Brexit day is nigh. What does Friday’s milestone really mean (and not mean) and what’s next for REC members as we move to the next phase? In reality, the real work is just beginning.Not much changes (yet)The UK formally leaves the EU on Friday, but not much changes in practice. Not yet. EU inspired...
CONTRACTORS HIT BY SPIRALLING PI INSURANCE COSTS
Posted on: 27 Jan 2020 at 13:41:04
The cost of professional indemnity insurance is becoming a major challenge for contractors, according to research published today by the Civil Engineering Contractors Association (CECA).In recent months CECA members have reported spiralling costs for professional indemnity (PI) insurance as the mark...