HMRC INTERNAL MANUAL EMPLOYMENT STATUS MANUAL
HMRC internal manual Employment Status Manual
Published: 7 March 2016
Updated: 10 February 2020 see all updates
Agency and temporary workers: the agency contract and the requirement for personal service
Applicable up to 5 April 2014
Section 47(1) ITEPA 2003
Section 44(1)(a) ITEPA 2003 requires that a worker personally provides or is under an obligation to personally provide services to the client. When a worker is actually undertaking an assignment they are providing their personal service which will be sufficient to satisfy the condition set out at section 44(1)(a).
The fact that the worker will provide personal service whilst on a particular assignment to satisfy section 44(1)(a) will not however be sufficient to satisfy the condition set out as section 44(1)(b) ITEPA 2003, unless the worker is required under the terms of the agency contract to provide the services personally.
Section 44(1)(b) is satisfied if the services are personally provided by the worker under the terms of an ‘agency contract’. Section 44(1)(b) needs to be considered in conjunction with section 47(1) which defines an ‘agency contract’ as a contract made between the worker and the agency under the terms of which the worker is obliged to personally provide services to the client. This requirement was not present in the previous agency legislation for tax, section 134 ICTA 1988.
The provision of a substitution clause within an agency contract
If under the terms of an agency contract the worker has a right of substitution, then that may indicate the worker is not obliged to personally provide services to the client. Whether or not there is an obligation to personally provide the services will depend upon whether the right of substitution is a genuine right and will depend upon the nature of the right - that is, whether the right is a limited or unfettered right of substitution. See guidance in relation to personal service and substitution at ESM0530 onwards.
Where it is found that the contract includes a genuine and unfettered right of substitution (that is, there is no obligation on the worker to personally provide services to the client), then the contract will not meet one of the required conditions for the agency legislation to apply. The contract will not be an agency contract as defined in section 47(1) and the condition at section 44(1)(b) will not be satisfied. Where this is found to be the case then remuneration receivable by the worker under the terms of the contract will not be treated as earnings chargeable to tax as employment income, the worker will not be treated as an employed earner for Class 1 NICs purposes and the agency/third party will not be treated as the secondary contributor for Class 1 NICs purposes.
See ESM7315 regarding the Upper Tribunal case of The Commissioners for HMRC and Talentcore Limited (t/a) Team Spirits  UKUT 423 (TCC).
From 6 April onwards the existence of an ‘agency contract’ is no longer a qualifying condition that must be satisfied before the agency legislation can be applied. See ESM2034for the qualifying conditions which apply from 6 April 2014 onwards.
Original Source - Gov.uk Employment Status Manual
STATUS DETERMINATION STATEMENT: OFF-PAYROLL EXPLAINER FOR APRIL 2021
The off-payroll framework is fast approaching, there are still two of the key requirements of the new IR35 legislation from April 2021 which seem to be shrouded in mystery, the main legislative obliga ...
IR35 - RISK TO CLIENT/BUSINESS
Article from Alexander Wilson LL.B. (Hons.) (Dunelm.), CTAIR35 barrister and CTA - Helping all corporations safely retain independent contractors with strong legal advice"Inside IR35" is NOT ...
IR35 POLL RESULT – CONTRACTORS WILL DUMP CLIENTS ISSUING PSC BLANKET BANS
IR35 Poll ResultThe ITContractor.com IR35 poll result shows that a vast majority of UK contractors plan to dump their clients if the client issues a blanket ban on contractors who use personal service ...
HMRC PENALISED DIRECTOR INSTEAD OF COMPANY
The first tier tribunal overturned the late filing penalties of a sole director for three reasons: the wrong taxpayer was named, HMRC misapplied the law, and she had a reasonable excuse.Angela Salazar ...
IR35 REVIEW: APSCO RESPONDS
Following news that the Government has launched an eleventh-hour review of changes to off-payroll working rules in a move ‘to address any concerns from businesses and affected individu ...
IR35 – LET'S HOLD POLITICIANS TO ACCOUNT
Delaying changes to IR35 in the private sector is a key message in the REC’s manifesto ‘Making Great Work Happen’. In our discussions with politicians we have consistently campaigned for a delay ...