blog header image

Posted : 04 Mar 2020 at 14:39:33
Category: News

Share this article

  • Published on March 4, 2020

Alexander Wilson LL.B. (Hons.) (Dunelm.), CTA

IR35 barrister and CTA - Helping all corporations safely retain independent contractors with strong legal advice

Key Point

  • Moving forward on the umbrella or PAYE model exposes the client to the risk of retroactive demand for historical PAYE / NIC.

 

Clients (to use the language of the off-payroll legislation) are in many cases deciding to entirely side-step the off-payroll legislation by refusing contracts with PSC's and insisting that workers accept PAYE or umbrella arrangements instead. In some cases, clients are doing this on the back of a Status Determination Statement ('SDS'), which is somewhat otiose.

What does this mean?

The first effect is that the off-payroll legislation is no longer in scope as there is no intermediary; the worker is either an employee of the client (albeit receiving salary through a third-party payroll provider) or an employee of the umbrella company.

Where a company unilaterally declares that going forward contractors previously engaged through their PSC's will be required to agree to umbrella or PAYE models, the contractor is in a 'take it or leave it' position. Whereas IR35 status is determinable on an assessment of the terms of the engagement, if the client insists on (actual) employment, that is what they will get.

So no 'Status Determination Statement' is required (hence, 'otiose'). The client is off the hook. Job done.

Not Quite

Consider ESM0117 (a section from HMRC's Employment Status Manual):

"Where it is agreed that a worker who has previously been regarded as self-employed should now be treated as employed, then you will need to consider whether to pursue the employer for NICs and tax for back years." [Emphasis added].

The danger of retrospective enquiry is that HMRC will look at what the determined status is going forward and seek to apply that going back.

So where a client continues to engage contractors through their PSC's but determines that Chapter 10, Part 2 ITEPA 2003 (the private sector off-payroll legislation) applies going forward, HMRC will expect that Chapter 8 (the old IR35) will have applied in the past. Here, the risk is primarily with the contractor's PSC which was liable for the PAYE and NIC's under Chapter 8.

On the other hand, if the client demands employment going forward (actual employment, not simply deemed 'inside IR35'), then why wouldn't HMRC ask why the engagement was not always an employed one? In that case, Chapter 8 would never have applied and the client would find themselves liable to unpaid PAYE / NIC's.

If HMRC did pursue the contractor's PSC (for example, on the basis that they are an easier target), the contractor's immediate response would be that HMRC should be chasing the client. I could see that as being a very attractive argument in the First-Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber).

Original Source - LinkedIn - PAYE Umbrella Side Stepping IR35

SIMILAR NEWS

blog header image
NEWS
BUDGET 2021: UK'S TAX BURDEN TO 'REACH HIGHEST LEVELS SINCE 1960S'

The UK's tax burden is to rise to its highest level since the 1960s, the Office for Budget Responsibility has said, after the chancellor set out plans to repair the nation's finances. Rishi Suna ...

blog header image
NEWS
CITB PROPOSES TAKING LEVY BACK UP TO PRE-COVID FIGURE

The Construction Industry Training Board (CITB) has proposed hiking its levy back up to pre-covid rates from 2022 as it launches a consultation into its funding proposals. The skills body had suspende ...

blog header image
NEWS
SELF-EMPLOYED WORKER NUMBERS 13% DOWN ON PRE-COVID LEVEL

Numbers of self-employed workers are slowly returning to the pre-Christmas level despite worries that many eastern Europeans would not return after the break. According to the construction industry& ...

blog header image
NEWS
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARDS DROP BY 12% IN JANUARY

The value of construction contract awards decreased by 12% in January to £4.3bn, 10% lower than the monthly average in 2020 When compared to December, construction contract awards in Januar ...

blog header image
NEWS
UBER HAS LOST IN THE SUPREME COURT. HERE’S WHAT HAPPENS NEXT

Uber has lost a landmark case in the Supreme Court and must now classify drivers on its platform as workers. The ruling entitles Uber drivers to minimum wage and holiday pay, protections they were una ...

blog header image
NEWS
REVERSE VAT IS FAST APPROACHING

VAT registered construction businesses are advised to be aware of the reverse charge measure that is to be implemented from 1 March 2021. Letters were distributed to every VAT registered construction ...

business-directory Business Directory
smartbusinessdirectory Payroll Services Business Directory
truebusinessdirectory payroll-services Directory
payroll-services Directory