GOVERNMENT FACING MORE PRESSURE OVER PRIVATE SECTOR IR35 PLANS
IR35 a 'fatal blow' to UK's Flexible Economy
A trade body has slammed the Government’s off-payroll working rules – known as IR35 – as discussions precede about extending this legislation change into the private sector.
Last Friday, (18th May 2018), the Government opened its consultation on proposals to extend IR35 off-payroll into the private sector. Currently it believes that only ten per cent of Personal Service Companies that should apply the legislation in the private sector do so. It also deduced that the cost of non-compliance with this legislation in the private sphere is costing the treasury £700million in the period 2017/18 – estimated to rise to £1.2billion in 2022/23.
However, Chris Bryce, CEO of IPSE, the Association of Independent Professionals and Self-Employed, has slammed the fact that HMRC are considering expanding the reforms into the private sector. He said: “For the Government to even consider introducing the ill-judged changes to IR35 in the public sector to the private sector before their full impact can be truly analysed is outrageous."
"It would be a fatal blow to the UK’s flexible economy."
“IPSE’s research – which suggests large numbers of contractors are walking away from the public sector, with a particularly bad effect on the NHS – paints a very different picture from the Government’s report. It is shameful that the Government did not publish the external research into the impacts of the public sector changes prior to announcing this consultation." Bryce also slammed the online tool, CEST, which is central to IR35 status determination. HMRC themselves previously admitted that they held no data on the accuracy of the tool.
“The Government is kidding itself if it thinks HMRC’s online tool – which it encourages people to use to determine their IR35 status – can be relied upon,” he continued. This latest condemnation of IR35 follows a court case last week in which a contractor overturned HMRC’s decision regards his tax status. The contract worker, who supplied his labour via a personal service company and through Capita, to the Department of Work and Pensions was believed by HMRC to be working inside IR35. However, contrary to the Government’s belief, a Judge found that the worker’s contract belonged outside of IR35 – primarily due to the absence of a sufficient degree of control over his working methods.
SOURCE: Recruitment Grapevine
IR35 - RISK TO CLIENT/BUSINESS
Article from Alexander Wilson LL.B. (Hons.) (Dunelm.), CTAIR35 barrister and CTA - Helping all corporations safely retain independent contractors with strong legal advice"Inside IR35" is NOT ...
HMRC INTERNAL MANUAL EMPLOYMENT STATUS MANUAL
HMRC internal manual Employment Status ManualPublished: 7 March 2016Updated: 10 February 2020 see all updatesAgency and temporary workers: the agency contract and the requirement for personal ser ...
IR35 POLL RESULT – CONTRACTORS WILL DUMP CLIENTS ISSUING PSC BLANKET BANS
IR35 Poll ResultThe ITContractor.com IR35 poll result shows that a vast majority of UK contractors plan to dump their clients if the client issues a blanket ban on contractors who use personal service ...
HMRC PENALISED DIRECTOR INSTEAD OF COMPANY
The first tier tribunal overturned the late filing penalties of a sole director for three reasons: the wrong taxpayer was named, HMRC misapplied the law, and she had a reasonable excuse.Angela Salazar ...
IR35 REVIEW: APSCO RESPONDS
Following news that the Government has launched an eleventh-hour review of changes to off-payroll working rules in a move ‘to address any concerns from businesses and affected individuals ...
IR35 – LET'S HOLD POLITICIANS TO ACCOUNT
Delaying changes to IR35 in the private sector is a key message in the REC’s manifesto ‘Making Great Work Happen’. In our discussions with politicians we have consistently campaigned for a delay ...